The Brooklyn Bridge: This is Not a Bridge!

Details

Author
Linda E. Neville
Topic/Subject Area
Art, Music, Literature, Crafts; Architecture, Buildings
Historical Era
Progressive Era, World War I, 1900–1928
Grade Level
Middle School (6–8)
Creation Date
2013
Last Revision Date
2024

Related items

About This Lesson

Summary and Objective

Joseph Stella (1877–1946), Brooklyn Bridge, c. 1919–1920. Oil on canvas, 84 3/4 × 76 5/8 in. (215.3 × 194.6 cm). Yale University Art Gallery, New Haven, Conn. Gift of Collection Société Anonyme.
Images

Walker Evans, Brooklyn Bridge, New York, 1929

Joseph Stella, Brooklyn Bridge, c. 1919–1920

Objectives
Focusing Statement

Today we are going to look at how an artist shares his insights into the relevance of an iconic object. Certain objects take on special meanings that transcend their functionality. The artist’s eye and skill raises these representations of objects to a different level. We will be considering the Brooklyn Bridge in New York City, today, by looking at a photograph, a painting, and a poem. We will ask ourselves: “When is a bridge not a bridge?”

Background Information

The Brooklyn Bridge, built by a father and son team of first John A. Roebling and his son, Washington Roebling, after the death of his father, opened in 1883. In this year, the bridge was a wonder! It was the largest suspension bridge in the Western Hemisphere. At the time of the photograph, by Walker Evans in 1929, other bridges had been built and the Brooklyn Bridge had become just a way of getting to and from Manhattan. Evans had been exposed to the “strict geometries” of modern art and his “dead-on” view of the bridge with its gothic-like towers urged people to see the artistry of design in this remarkable structure. His photograph made the Brooklyn Bridge an icon. People sensed the importance of this bridge as a symbol of modern technology. In a different way, the painting by Joseph Stella, a Futuristic artist, gives us his impression of the bridge at night in 1919. He includes the reflection of lights and uses movement to create the sounds of trains, and a dark palette to allow us to hear the moaning of tug-boats below. Walt Whitman celebrates the sights and sounds of Manhattan, Brooklyn and the East River in his poem published in 1856. He also makes a case for the connectivity of everything created: man, bird, tug-boat, river, skyscrapers, etc. and brings a sense of joy and awe of the creativity symbolized in this arena.

Examining Expressive Content

Materials & Resources

Teaching Plan

  1. Students will do internet research on the artists’ lives and the time before, during, and after World War I as a backdrop to the transition into the modern times.
  2. Students will compare and contrast the life of Americans growing up in a large city such as New York as opposed to those living in a small town by looking at population figures, skyline views, size of rivers, quality of life, and transportation needs.
Putting It All Together

After revisiting the images and the poem, and having a class discussion on what they now see more clearly, I would like to extend the lesson to see if students have attained mastery of skills of observation and interpretation. I would like to have them look for something in their community that might be seen as being more than just functional. A western Massachusetts example of this would be the Hoosac Tunnel. Students could take photographs, paint, or write a poem about its significance as being more than just a functional passage for trains.