Changes in Deerfield, Massachusetts Shown in Maps (1780-1820)

Details

Author
Mary Gene Devlin, Bette Schmitt
Topic/Subject Area
Land, Environment, Geography; Architecture, Buildings; Demographics, Census; Commerce, Business, Trade, Consumerism
Historical Era
The New Nation, 1784–1815
Grade Level
Elementary (K–5), Middle School (6–8)
Creation Date
2000
Last Revision Date
2024

Related items

About This Lesson

Summary and Objective

Unit Central Questions:

What do primary and secondary sources teach us about the characteristics of “everyday life” of individuals living in Deerfield at the four turns of the centuries? What do these characteristics reveal about changes in the town since its beginning as an English settlement?

Key Content Ideas Taught in this Lesson and Teacher Background

Maps of the same area from different time periods show the ways in which the land stayed the same, and the ways Deerfield changed over the years.

For more information, read: Changes in Deerfield, Massachusetts Shown on Maps

Intended Learning Outcomes

Understandings:

Students will understand that:

  1. Maps that were made at different times show how Deerfield changed. 
  2. Maps were made for specific purposes, and this influences what is included or excluded on them.
Skills:

Students will be able to:

  1. Read and analyze historic manuscript maps. 
  2. Compare and contrast two maps, noting differences in scale, symbols, and places identified. 
  3. Identify how Deerfield changed during this period by comparing the information on the two maps. 
  4. Identify areas of present-day Deerfield on the historical maps by comparing them with a modern topographical map.

Materials & Resources

Primary and Secondary Sources:
  1. 1794 “Plan of the Town of Deerfield” (David Hoyt’s map)
  2.  Arthur Hoyt’s 1831 “Plan of Deerfield in the County of Franklin from an Actual Survey”
  3. U.S. Geological Survey map of Greenfield. A hard copy can be ordered online from the U.S.G.S. website.
Other:
  1. Student notebooks.
  2. Chalkboard and/or chart paper

Teaching Plan

In Preparation for Teaching
  1. Make copies of the two Hoyt maps, or prepare to have students work online–it may be helpful to zoom in.
Activities

Activity 1 – Analyzing a Historical Manuscript

  1. Distribute individual topographical maps of Deerfield (“Greenfield” map) to each student.
  2. Instruct then to identify the points of the compass on the map. Then have them identify the highest and lowest points in Deerfield, the Connecticut River, Deerfield River, the location of Old Deerfield, and present-day bridges (note: this is a review from the lesson “Topography and Geology of Deerfield”).
  3. Distribute individual copies of the 1794 “Hoyt” map.
  4. Instruct students to determine the points of the compass on this map, using the topographical map as a guide.
  5. Ask students to note places they became familiar with in previous lessons and those that show up for the first time on the Hoyt map. What stayed the same and what changed over the years? Instruct students to  list in their notebooks these places and any new symbols or names they find on the Hoyt map. Guiding questions might be: Have the riverbeds changed? Why do you think Hoyt made the mountains that big? Note the names of the ferries. Why do you think there is no detail on the east side of the Connecticut River?
  6. Discuss differences students found, and have the class add them to their lists in their notebooks.

Activity 2 – Comparing the Two Maps

  1. Hold a discussion comparing and contrasting the two maps and analyzing the growth of the town between 1794 and 1831. Instruct students to use their homework as a basis for the discussion and make a list of changes on chalkboard or chart paper. Guiding questions:
    • What do you find on the 1831 map that was not illustrated on the one from 1794?
    • Arthur Hoyt left out some buildings on Albany road on his map. Why might he have done this?
    • Note the change in the course of the river. Discuss how this may have come about.
    • What are the problems in comparing these hand-drawn maps to modern ones? What can be gained from them?
    • Compare the information contained in a topographical map vs. a modern roadmap vs. a historical hand-drawn map.
  2. After the discussion, compose a class paragraph about the growth of the town from 1794 -1831, based on the discussion. Have students copy the paragraph into their notebooks.
Homework Assignment
  1. Distribute copies of 1831 Arthur Hoyt map to each student.
  2. Ask them to use the 1794 and topographical maps to orient themselves as they examine the 1831 map.
  3. Instruct them to compare and contrast the two maps, noting the different scales, the part of the town pictured, and the places mentioned on the 1831 map that were not on the one from 1794. Students should take notes in their notebooks.
Assessment

Use the homework assignment.